I really enjoyed the line of questioning in this. It changes a lot of the information for me. At times it strengthens the argument by prying into greater details, and at times it changes the way I previously looked at things (like when the interviewer asks Lagouranis what made him so sure the people were innocent he admits that he has no way of knowing their guilt or innocense and seemed to be just going off of a statistic - thereby weakening the argument - and then adds the anecdote about the man arrested for the shovel and cell phone thereby strengthening the argument). Fascinating stuff.
1 Comments:
I really enjoyed the line of questioning in this. It changes a lot of the information for me. At times it strengthens the argument by prying into greater details, and at times it changes the way I previously looked at things (like when the interviewer asks Lagouranis what made him so sure the people were innocent he admits that he has no way of knowing their guilt or innocense and seemed to be just going off of a statistic - thereby weakening the argument - and then adds the anecdote about the man arrested for the shovel and cell phone thereby strengthening the argument). Fascinating stuff.
Post a Comment
<< Home